Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Wheel Column: Shut Up, Ann!

How the Wicked Witch of the Right Hurts Conservatives

Ann Coulter has always been controversial. She loves to make contentious statements that help rally the conservative base and, more importantly, help her sell books. Even though Democrats and many moderates routinely attack Coulter for her remarks, until now most conservatives have defended Coulter as one who has stood up for the right.

But Coulter's latest remarks have elicited criticism from both sides of the aisle. Coulter finally crossed the line in a speech she gave last Friday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C. She was the keynote speaker and was giving her thoughts of various Democratic presidential candidates.

"I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate, John Edwards," Coulter said, "but it turns out that you have to go into rehab if you use the word 'faggot,' so I'm - so, kind of at an impasse, can't really talk about Edwards, so I think I'll just conclude here and take your questions."

Using a homophobic slur to describe a candidate is unacceptable. I will defend Coulter's right to free speech until the end, but with freedom of speech comes a responsibility. Spewing hate and insluts is not responsible.

As expected, most Democrats immediately attacked Coulter for her remarks. John Edwards' campaign sent out an e-mail asking supporters to help raise $100,000 in "Coulter Cash" to combat her bigoted remarks. They easily raised this amount.

But Republicans also found themselves attacking Coulter. Each of the three GOP presidential frontrunners denounced the remarks. John McCain's spokesman said, "The comments were wildly inappropriate." Rudy Giuliani said, "The comments were completely inappropriate and there should be no place for such name-calling in political debate." And Mitt Romney's spokesman said, "It was an offensive remark."

Other conservatives, especially conservative bloggers, were also critical of Coulter's remarks. Michelle Malkin, a conservative blogger, wrote, "Her 'faggot' joke was not just a distraction from all the good that was highlighted and represented at the conference. It was the equivalent of a rhetorical fragging - an intentionally-tossed verbal grenade that exploded in her own fellow ideological soldiers' tent."

Many conservatives are realizing that Coulter hurts their cause. She is distracting and offensive, driving moderates away. Conservatives do not want to defend and be associated with her stupid and hateful remarks. Last year it was calling the 9/11 widows "witches," now it's using a slur to describe a candidate. Who knows who she will offend next?

Ann Coulter is a media whore who will say anything to get in the spotlight. She is a cancer on the American body politic. Responding to her remarks on Edwards, she said, "C'mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean."

She just doesn't get it. Her remarks are hateful and set back useful political discourse. Conservatives should disown Coulter as a traitor, hurtful to their cause. The American people should hope she just disappears.

I wouldn't count on it. She'll be back with another offensive verbal barrage sooner than you think.

Benjamin Van der Horst is a College sophomore from Cincinnati. He is executive director of the nonpartisan political organization CSAmerica and the managing editor of the Emory Political Review.

This ran on 3/9/07.

Wheel Column: Anna Nicole Overload

Why Report on the Iraq War When You Can Cover Anna Nicole Smith?

Memorandum:
To: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC
Re: Anna Nicole Coverage

As you are certainly aware, Anna Nicole Smith is dead. She's been dead for two and a half weeks now. But all of you insist on beating this story to death. Along with diaper-wearing, cross-country driving, love triangle-participating astronaut Lisa Nowak, Anna Nicole has received a nauseating amount of coverage.

Anna Nicole died. She was a celebrity. Sounds like a good two-minute story for the cable news channels and maybe a 30-second piece for the nightly newscasts. But wall-to-wall coverage on all the cable stations and long pieces on the networks? Two weeks after her death?

Five different men are claiming to be the father of her child. Her son died recently. She is still involved in court battles with her former husband about his fortune. She was in a legal battle over a home in the Bahamas. All of this is nice to know, but if anything, it has a place in US Weekly and the other trashy tabloids, and not on television news.

On Thursday, Feb. 8, I was in the Atlanta airport getting ready to catch a flight when I saw CNN's Wolf Blitzer hosting nonstop coverage about her death, calling it "breaking news." CNN medical correspondent and Emory faculty member Sanjay Gupta was brought on the air constantly to talk about possible causes of death. A CNN reporter was on the scene where she died interviewing people. It was complete overkill. It wasn't a former president who just died. It was a stripper turned playmate turned diet pill spokeswoman turned tabloid favorite.

On that Thursday, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism, which monitors cable news channels, the story about Smith consumed half of all coverage on those channels and a fifth of the overall coverage for the week, even though the story didn't break until Thursday afternoon.

There are a few journalists who deserve to be praised for refusing to give in to this Anna Nicole Smith nonsense. CNN's Lou Dobbs refused to cover Anna Nicole at all, saying during a preview of his show during Wolf's Blitzer's blitzkrieg of coverage, "...And over the course of the next hour... there will be no reporting... beginning at the top of the hour... on the passing of Anna Nicole Smith. We hope you'll join us... Wolf, back to you." After initially covering it, Fox News' Bill O'Reilly and NBC's Brian Williams both stopped focusing on the story.

There is a war going on in Iraq. There is another war going on in Afghanistan. American troops are dying every day. Iran is getting closer to nuclear weapons. These are all very newsworthy topics. Meanwhile, American media are obsessed with Anna Nicole Smith.

If the coverage would have lasted a couple days, maybe I would be a bit more tolerant of it. But it has been going on nearly non-stop, and has picked up even more last week as the trial over who gets her body concluded. She's dead. I don't care who gets her body. It is not news.

MSNBC has been the worst offender of Anna Nicole overloading, mentioning her name 330 times last Thursday, according to transcript searches done by TVEyes.com. But Fox News and CNN Headline News have not been far behind. CNN has finally toned down its coverage a bit, even daring to air an interview with Condoleeza Rice last Wednesday rather than an Anna Nicole court hearing that was covered on the other channels.

This madness needs to stop. News channels need to cover news, not celebrities.

Benjamin van der Horst is a College sophomore from Cincinnati. He is executive director of the nonpartisan political organization CSAmerica and the managing editor of the Emory Political Review.

This ran on 2/27/07.